Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Keri
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 2006No. 02A03-0603-CV-135Published
1Opinion of the Court
858 N.E.2d 1017 (2006)
Virginia HARTMAN and Suzanne Swinehart, Appellants-Defendants,
v.
Dr. Gabe KERI, Appellee-Plaintiff.
No. 02A03-0603-CV-135.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
December 27, 2006.
Karen R. Orr, Stuart & Branigin LLP, Lafayette, IN, Attorney for Appellants.
Swaray E. Conteh, The Law Office of Swaray Conteh, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee.
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Suzanne Swinehart and Virginia Hartman bring this interlocutory appeal following the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment. We address a single dispositive issue on review,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.