Legal Opinion

Marsh Investment Corporation v. John A. Langford, Pontchartrain State Bank, Defendant/third-Party v. Eunice K. Langford, Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 3, 1986No. 85-3570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

The facts of this case are set out in detail at 721 F.2d 1011. In brief, the appellant challenges, on grounds of fraud, a settlement agreement that it entered into with one of the appellees. The question presented is whether the appellant has waived its claim for recission of the fraudulently-induced settlement agreement through its negligence.

Title XVII of Book III of the Louisiana Civil Code, “Of Transaction or Compromise,” contains 13 articles that specifically govern settlement agreements. Article 3071 provides, in pertinent part, that

A transaction or compromise is an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cole v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. La Croix v. RecknagelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Marsh Investment Corp. v. LangfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gretchen E. Kurzweg Marple v. Frank T. Kurzweg and Frank Turner Kurzweg, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. First Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Twin City Savings Bank, Fsb, and Twin City Savings Bank, FsaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API