Kamber v. Becker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 193, Oct. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1904, No. 449, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Bernard Kamber, trading as B. Kamber & Company, to use of tbe State Bank of New York v. J. Becker. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 193, Oct. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1904, No. 449, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Bernard Kamber, trading as B. Kamber & Company, to use of tbe State Bank of New York v. J. Becker. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense. Plaintiff claims to recover from defendant the sum of 1284.75, with legal interest thereon, being the amount of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant by Bernard Kamber, trading as B. Kamber &…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mobbison, J.,
The court below discharged a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, and to this order plaintiff excepted and a bill was sealed.
*269The declaration avers a “ claim to recover from the defendant the sum of $284.75, with legal interest thereon, being the amount of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant by Bernard Kamber, trading as B. Kamber & Co., as per copy of his book of original entries hereunto annexed and made part of this statement of demand.”
The declaration then avers an assignment of this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Montgomery v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
- Bridgeman Bros. v. SwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Citizens' Trust & Surety Co. v. HowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Adams v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Davidov v. BailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903