Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Boyan v. O'Connor

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 26, 1991Published

1Concurrence

PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

concurring.

Although I concur with the opinion of the court, I am of the view that appellants are entitled to prevail on other grounds which should be addressed. The regulations of the so-called “Salary Adjustment Committee” (SAC) concededly do not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 et seq. Those regulations have been challenged on this appeal. The applicability of the APA has been briefed and is before us. Moreover, since the trial judge had transferred the dispute to SAC it is appropriate to focus on that entity and the basis for its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. White v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Woodland Private Study Group v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Garden State Farms, Inc. v. BaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Karcher v. KeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API