Legal Opinion

Savage v. Howell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1940No. 4554Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

MABRY, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant, moving for rehearing, sets forth two grounds therefor. In addition, he calls to our attention a claimed erroneous statement in our recital of the facts. The statement that “the complaint does not allege any amount of interest to have been lost by virtue of the appeal” was inadvertently made. The complaint does allege a loss of interest on the judgment because of the stay and delay occasioned by the appeal and supersedeas. This inaccuracy of statement, however, in no way affects the result reached.

Only one of the two grounds for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armijo v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Corker v. WardIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Jones-Downes Co. v. ChandlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API