Donaldson v. Jackson

The plaintiff objected preliminarily to a motion made by the defendant, that short notice had been given, and asked costs for appearing to oppose. It was said in opposition, that if the plaintiff insisted on his objection, he was not entitled to costs, because, knowing the notice to be defective, he was not bound to appear. But by The Court, he might think it prudent to appear, lest by inadvertence the defect in the notice might not be observed, and the motion pass against him ; and having appeared, he is entitled to costs.*

Such also is now the settled practice of the court in relation to…