Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga Falls Education Ass'n v. Cuyahoga Falls City School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1991No. 90-1113PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the Board properly implemented a reduction-in-force pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the Board and the Association. For the reasons which follow we find the Board’s action was in accord with the collective bargaining agreement.

In Article XII of the collective bargaining agreement the parties agreed that under certain conditions the Board could implement a reduction-in-force. Thus, pursuant to Article XII(A) of the parties’ agreement:

“1. Teachers shall not be discharged or laid off pursuant to a necessary reduction in personnel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Phillips v. South Range Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Naylor v. Cardinal Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Naylor v. Cardinal Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Streetsboro Education Ass'n v. Streetsboro City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Young v. Washington Local School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API