Legal Opinion

People v. Samuel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered April 27, 1995, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts) and rape in the third degree (five counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*528Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the prosecution failed to prove the element of forcible compulsion in connection with the charges of rape in the first degree. That claim was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, is without merit. The forcible compulsion element of rape…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. YeadenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. HodgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. ZarifaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API