Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilkes Ex Rel. Mason v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2006No. 11 & 12 WAP 2005Published

1DissentJustice Newman

I respectfully dissent from the Opinion of the Majority. In particular, I find that based on the facts involved in the present matter, Appellees could prove fraud at trial and, as such, the doctrine of res judicata does not apply.

Two issues frame my discussion. First, this is a summary judgment proceeding. Therefore, we must review the record “in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and all doubts as to the existence of a genuine issue of material fact must be resolved against the moving party.” Payne v. Dep’t of Corr., 582 Pa. 375, 871 A.2d 795, 800 (2005); Pappas v. Asbel, 564…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API