Peck v. Bridwell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The petition was insufficient. — Porter v. Tooke, 35 Mo. 107; Kuhleman v. Schuler, 35 Mo. 142 ; Fitzgerald v. Thomas, 61 Mo. 499.
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
This is an action for the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien. The petition alleges that at a date named the plaintiffs were copartners; that at the same date defendant Bridwell, under a contract between himself and defendant Porter, began to erect six two-story buildings on a lot of land described, “ which tract is owned by” defendant Porter ; that Bridwell erected the buildings under the contract; and that plaintiffs, at the request of, and under contract with, Bridwell, furnished for the erection of said buildings, between certain dates named, certain lumber, of which the particulars are set…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Welch v. BryanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Porter v. TookeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
- Black v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Shaw v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Wilcox v. KeithMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1871
3Cited by5 opinions
- Structo Corp. v. Leverage Investment Enterprises, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cole v. BarronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
- Cagle v. Chillicothe Town Mutual Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- Peck v. BridwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- Currell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902