United States v. Hayward
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MAHONEY, Judge:
Appellate defense counsel contend that the charges against the accused, one of two co-actors charged jointly, were not referred to trial. We find this contention to be without merit and affirm.1
The origin of the defense contention is the fact that the record of trial contains two DD Forms 458, each of which the defense characterizes as a “charge sheet” for one of the respective accused. The first of these DD Forms 458 contains information pertaining to the co-actor on page one. Page two contains properly drafted joint specifications, naming the accused and the co-actor.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. ChristmanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CoteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. ChoyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992