Legal Opinion

Martin v. Strubel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1937No. 24047. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

The principal issue is whether a statute which confers power on courts of equity to render deficiency decrees in foreclosure proceedings, is repugnant to sections 2 and 5 of article 2 of the Illinois constitution, in that it deprives the mortgagor of due process of law and the right of trial by jury. The section in question (State Bar Stat. 1935, chap. 95, sec. 16, p. 2139,) provides, in part, that “In all decrees hereafter to be made in suits in equity directing foreclosure of mortgages, a decree may be rendered for any balance of money that may be found due to the complainant over and above…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rabbitt v. Frank C. Weber & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Flaherty v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Sturges & Burn Manufacturing Co. v. PastelIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Dowden v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Shedd v. SeefeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lakeview Trust & Savings Bank v. EstradaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Logan County Building & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. Benzakry v. PatelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. Metrobank v. CannatelloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API