People v. McDowell
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
Defendant, Charles William McDowell, appeals the order denying his Crim. P. 85(c) postconviction motion. He contends that the postconviction court erred when, after concluding that the evidence raised a presumption that he was improperly subjected to an interrogation style held unconstitutional in Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 648 (2004), it denied relief on his outrageous governmental conduct claim because it concluded that Seibert was not retroactively applicable to his case. He also asserts that the court erred in denying a hearing…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lebere v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Peo v. HouserColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- People v. Clinton CooperColorado Court of Appeals · 2023
- Jamale D. Townsell v. The People of the State of Colorado.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026
- v. BurlingameColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.