State v. Harris

The state petitions for a writ of certiora-ri to quash an order of the circuit court requiring the state to disclose the specific location and type of surveillance equipment used to observe the drug transaction which is the subject of the underlying criminal prosecution. The state claims a “surveillance location privilege.” However, it acknowledges that we have recently rejected this privilege in Rainner v. State, 801 So.2d 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which extended the holding of Judd v. State, 781 So.2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Because Rainner is controlling here, we deny the petition.

The…