Phillips v. Woxman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Defendants contend that the federal marketing quotas for tobacco are controlled by Part I of Section B, Subchapter II of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 1311, et seq., and thus, the Superior Court of Pitt County did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action. We disagree and hold that the Superior Court had jurisdiction to hear and to decide whether deeds describing North Carolina land executed by North Carolina residents may be reformed although such reformation relates to a tobacco allotment.
Defendants contend the failure of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Durham v. CreechCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Archer v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Parker v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Archer v. . McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- McBride v. Johnson Oil & Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Phillips v. WoxmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980