Poling v. Peter R. Rylance, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Chief Judge.
This cause is affirmed.
An employer is not liable for injury caused to a third party by his employee’s German Shepherd dog if the bringing of that dog to the worksite is not consented to or encouraged by the employer, of no benefit to the employer, not within the scope of the employee’s duties, and the employer has no knowledge of the vicious propensities of the animal. In such circumstances the employer breaches no duty to a third party who lives down the street from the worksite and is attacked. See Whetzel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 266 So.2d 89 (Fla.4th DCA…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whetzel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Dickson v. Graham-Jones Paper CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roberts v. 219 SOUTH ATLANTIC BLVD., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Martin v. Gulfstream Metal Plating, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008