Legal Opinion
DeCillis v. Grannis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 19, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing required by law, Emd at which evidence is taken, is limited to whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179 [1978]). Substantial evidence “means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d at 180; see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443 *852[1987]; Matter of Venditti v New York State Dept, of Envtl.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bradley Corporate Park v. CrottyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Venditti v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. IwanowiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Carney's Restaurant, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Colortone Camera, Inc. v. New York State Compensation Insurance Rating BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Colortone Camera, Inc. v. New York State Compensation Insurance Rating BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Reddock v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.