Prescott v. Riverside Park Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Frank R. Gaynor, Judge. Intervener Louise Larson, in the summer of 1894, recovered a judgment for personalinjuries against the defendant, the. Riverside Park Railway Company, for seven thousand five hundred dollars.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Frank R. Gaynor, Judge. Intervener Louise Larson, in the summer of 1894, recovered a judgment for personalinjuries against the defendant, the. Riverside Park Railway Company, for seven thousand five hundred dollars. More than two years prior thereto, said defendant company was organized under the laws of the state of Iowa, and con-' structed and owned a railway track, electrical equipments, wires, poles, electric motors, and street cars. It had, long prior to the recovery of the aforesaid judgment, executed a deed of trust to the intervener, the…
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
1 I. This is an equity cause, triable de novo in this court. Appellee files an abstract, in which it denies the correctness of appellant’s abstract, denies that all of the testimony offered or introduced upon the trial in the court below was duly filed and made a part of the record, and avers that appellant’s abstract and appellee’s abstract do not contain all the evidence offered or introduced on said trial. Appellant files an amendment, averring that appellant’s abstract and appellee’s abstract, and appellant’s reply abstract do contain all the evidence offered and introduced on the trial.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kunz v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896