Rene Flores Esquivel v. Loretta Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we reject the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) interpretation of the statute it administers and vacate the BIA decision under review. We do so because the plain language of the relevant statute clearly contradicts the interpretation that the BIA would give it.
Under § 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), aliens are rendered removable by most drug convictions, except those that constitute “a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana.” 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)®. The BIA has interpreted…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ivan Rodriguez Vazquez v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Maria Cardoso de Flores v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Hidalgo v. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
- Ivan Rodriguez Vazquez v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Silva de Santiago v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025