Legal Opinion

Mobile & Girard Railroad v. Prewitt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of Bullock. Tried before Hon. J. McOaleb Wiley. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is an action for damages instituted by the appellee against the appellant as a common carrier. There are two counts in the complaint, which are as follows: “The plaintiff claims of the- defendant, a corporate body, two hundred and eighty-three dollars and fifteen cents, as damages for the failure to deliver certain goods, namely, two boxes of merchandise, containing sundry ar*64tides of dry goods, received by said Mobile & Girard railroad company as a common carrier, to be delivered to the plaintiff at station No. 6 on said railroad, for a reward, which he failed to do.

“And the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ala. & Tenn. Rivers Railroad v. KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  2. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  3. Selma & Meridian Railroad v. Butts & FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Collins v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Bennett v. Northern Pacific Express Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Kennedy Bros. v. Mobile & Girard RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Rosenbaum v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API