Legal Opinion

State v. Eixenberger

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2004No. 02-520PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Matthew Dean Eixenberger (Eixenberger) was charged with two felony counts of burglary in violation of § 45-6-204, MCA, in the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County. Eixenberger moved to suppress evidence gained from an investigative stop, but the District Court denied the motion. Eixenberger then entered an Alford plea to Count I of the information and reserved his right to appeal the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Eixenberger now appeals, and we affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. GopherMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. TackittMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. ReynoldsMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. LaffertyMontana Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WarclubMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Billings v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LoneyMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BonamarteMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. BrittMontana Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API