Legal Opinion

Colbath v. Mechanicks National Bank

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 3, 1950No. 3872Published

1Opinion of the Court

96 N.H. 110 (1950)

GEORGE A. COLBATH & a

v.

MECHANICKS NATIONAL BANK.

No. 3872.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

January 3, 1950.

Maurice A. Broderick (by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

Orr & Reno and Eugene C. Struckhoff (Mr. Struckhoff orally), for the defendants.

BLANDIN, J.

The plaintiff, while admitting a valid factors lien was created by the agreement by the borrower with the bank, claims it was later invalidated because, first, the borrower was permitted by the defendant bank to use the proceeds of sales in the ordinary course of business without accounting to the defendant; second, there…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wasserman v. McDonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. In Re Comet Textile Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  3. Colbath v. Mechanicks National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
  4. Matter of Comet Textile Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API