Legal Opinion

Killough v. Swift & Co. Fertilizer Works

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1941No. 35,211PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to quiet title to real estate, and from an adverse judgment the defendants appeal. The principal question at the trial was whether the particular real estate was and had been the homestead of plaintiff’s predecessor in title at the time plaintiff acquired the title, and arose out of the following circumstances:

*114Elmer Killough purchased the particular real estate in 1913, and there is no question but that he and his family occupied it as a homestead from the date of purchase until May, 1931. On August 24,193.6, Elmer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blitz ex rel. Erickson v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Peoples State Bank v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schnug v. SchnugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Dickey v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Fisher v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API