Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kirkpatrick v. Tipton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 16, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRANKS, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the refusal of the chancellor to award plaintiffs any part of the contract price in a contract between Blountville Utility District and Tipton Construction Company, Inc., as a penalty pursuant to T.C.A., § 12-4-102.1

On May 17, 1977, the Blountville Utility District, established pursuant to the Utility District Law, T.C.A., § 7-82-101 et seq., entered a contract with Harold Tipton to be manager of the utility and another contract which provided that Tipton Construction Company would perform normal maintenance for the utility district. At the time, Harold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mascari v. RainesTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. CohnTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Savage v. MynattTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Crass v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  5. M. F. Parsley & Co. v. Cole & MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Memphis Publishing Company v. Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. Plastic Surgery Associates Of Kingsport Inc. v. Gregory H. PastrickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API