Legal Opinion

Bangura v. Shulkin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 26, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10614-JGDPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Once the ORM accepts any feasible claims, it assigns those claims to an impartial investigator to obtain evidence from the complainant and compile an investigative file. (Def. Ex. N at 4). An investigator is only authorized to investigate the claims accepted by ORM. (Id. ) On August 13, 2015, the Plaintiff requested leave to amend her Complaint, which was granted, to add additional claims that she was subjected to a hostile work environment based on disability, race, national origin and reprisal. (See DF ¶¶ 42-43; Def. Ex. P at 2-3). Upon completion of its investigation, the ORM issued a…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bean v. NICE Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  2. Connolly v. Massachusetts Department of Conservation and RecreationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  3. Cordero-Ayala v. The United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
  4. Faltas v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  5. King v. McDonoughDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API