Legal Opinion
State v. Tull
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 10, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 N.J. Super. 486 (1989)
560 A.2d 1331
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT N. TULL, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Burlington County.
Decided January 10, 1989.
John S. Sitzler for defendant (Mathews, Sitzler, Weishoff & Sitzler, attorneys).
Janine L. Long, for the State, appearing pursuant to R. 1:21-3(b) (Stephen G. Raymond, Prosecutor).
HAINES, A.J.S.C.
The defendant, Robert Tull, was charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol ("DWI"). Through counsel, he served a written request for discovery upon the Prosecutor. A copy of the request is annexed to this…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. R.W.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CarreroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- State v. FordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. YoungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- State v. MaricicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010