In Re the Marriage of Wallace
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
OXBERGER, Chief Judge.
The respondent wife appeals from the division of property in the trial court’s decree of dissolution, and alleges that the trial court should have recused itself and that the trial court should have reopened the case for the receipt of additional evidence. The petitioner cross-appeals. We affirm.
The parties were married on November 6, 1963. This was the husband’s second marriage, and the wife’s fifth marriage and third husband. Both parties had children from their former marriages, but no children were born from this marriage. The wife was a secretary-receptionist prior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- In Re the Marriage of SteenhoekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Locke v. LockeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- In Re the Marriage of BeehSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Marriage of GeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- In Re the Marriage of MuelhauptSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- In Re the Marriage of HavranCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
- In Re the Marriage of EklofeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- In Re the Marriage of OlerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.