Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant Janice Nyflot appeals the trial court’s order sustaining the Commissioner of Public Safety’s revocation of her driving privileges for refusing to submit to chemical testing under the implied consent law, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1984). Appellant claims she was denied her right to consult an attorney when she was asked to submit to chemical testing. She was told that under the new 1984 law she had no such right. We reverse and hold that under the 1984 legislation, a right to consult an attorney still exists.
facts'
Appellant was arrested for D.W.I. about 1:30…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Nordeen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Corriveau v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Blake v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.