Legal Opinion
Abound Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 30, 1991No. 91-5024Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
940 F.2d 678
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ABOUND CORPORATION, Alder Corporation Antelope Park
Partnership, Brisk Corporation, Buskin Corporation, Kathy A.
Callahan, Clew Corporation, Doxy Corporation, Echo
Corporation, Eider…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sidney H. Wright, III v. Preferred Research, Inc., a Georgia Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Rados v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- D Kim (Douglas s.t.), D/B/A J.H. Upsun Company, Upson Corporation v. Park (Michael), A/K/A Hwa Taek Park, Michael Park's Trading & Sales, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991