Kroger Co. v. Bowers
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The taxpayer contends that its use of the optional methods of depreciation for federal income tax purposes has the effect of merely suspending the payment of a portion of that tax which will certainly be paid in future years as its depreciable assets reach exhaustion and the rate of depreciation decelerates.
*78It, therefore, maintains that the total amount which it characterizes as “deferred income taxes” is a liability and as such is deductible from its surplus in computing its annual corporation franchise tax.
The difficulty with this contention is that Section 5733.05, Revised Code, expressly…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Goudchaux/Maison Blanche v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Broadwell Realty Corp. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Xtra, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- In re Estate of MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.