Legal Opinion
Krolak v. Chicago Express, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 2, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 N.J. Super. 60 (1950)
76 A.2d 266
JOSEPHINE V. KROLAK, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL KROLAK, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHICAGO EXPRESS, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 16, 1950.
Decided November 2, 1950.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. John T. Keefe argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph J. Takacs, attorney).
Mr. Charles A. Rooney argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by WM. J. BRENNAN, J.A.D.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mesce v. Automobile Association of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Paiewonsky v. JoffeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Ferris v. McArdleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Shefts v. FreeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Coopersmith v. KaltSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gilborges v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Wright v. Globe Porcelain Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- DiNizio v. BurzynskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Kimball v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- Cucci v. JaldiniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.