Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 3, 1999No. 1981053PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tony Bowers and Ann Bowers, husband and wife, sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), seeking compensatory and punitive damages for mental anguish and for the damage to their property caused when their automobile, which had been serviced by Wal-Mart, caught fire; the fire destroyed the car and the Bowerses' house and its contents. The Bowerses asserted claims of negligence, wantonness, breach of warranty, and negligent training and supervision. Following a trial, the jury returned a general verdict for the Bowerses, awarding them $1 million. The court entered a judgment on that verdict.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. AALAR, Ltd., Inc. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Mattingly v. HoustonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Gregath v. BatesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. TunstallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte Grand Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Willis v. GAMI GOLDEN GLADES, LLC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Qore, Inc. v. Bradford Bldg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Birmingham Coal Coke Co., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API