Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1935No. 25342PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This action was originally brought in the county court of Ottawa county for the recovery of the sum of $540 on a life insurance policy. The defendant, the Prudential Life Insurance Company of America, defended on the alleged ground that the; applicant was not in sound health at the time the policy was issued, and that according to a provision in the policy rendering the same void if the applicant was not in sound health at the time; of its issuance, the policy never went into effect.

The trial court instructed a verdict as fol lows:

“Gentlemen of the jury, in this case plaintiff sues the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Johnson v. Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Holcomb v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Baker v. WittenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. National Mutual Casualty Co. v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Highway Commission v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Lowden v. LutherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API