M. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
Petitioners, [T.M. and R.R.M.], have moved for review of Special Master Brian H. Corcoran’s decision that they are not entitled to compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10—300aa-15 (Vaccine Act or Act). Petitioners assert that the Diptheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis (DTaP) vaccine administered to their son, A.P.M., on July 14, 2006, triggered a form of cerebral folate deficiency which caused A.P.M.’s autistic regression, ultimately resulting in apraxia of speech and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) features.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Debra Ann Knudsen, by Her Parents and Legal Guardians, Doris P. Knudsen and Dale Knudsen v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Austin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Bender v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Kreizenbeck v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Rogero v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017