Tinker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
We are urged to reconsider the ruling to the effect that there was no harmful error in receiving the testimony of the prosecutrix, Maggie Ray, and her sister Neoma Ray, after they had conferred with each other and with the district attorney and others in the presence of each other.
We understand from the two bills of exception on the subject that in opening the case, Neoma Ray was introduced by the State and at the close of her testimony, the court took recess until the following morning.
Before the recess she testified in substance that she and her sister, Maggie, together with Adams and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Hubbard v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Davis v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- State v. GesellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Venable v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.