Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (2002)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided June 28, 2002Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Chairman Halley,
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:
1. Is it the responsibility of the Oklahoma JudicialNominating Commission or the Governor of the State of Oklahoma todeclare a vacancy in the office of district judge as provided in51 O.S. 2001, § 10[51-10]?
2. Does a vacancy occur so that the Judicial NominatingCommission must choose and submit nominees to the Governor when ajudgment of the Court on the Judiciary of the State of Oklahoma,Trial Division, removing a district judge from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Sharpe v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar AssociationCourt on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · 1968
- Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Nesbitt v. AppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.