Legal Opinion

Dalton v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1896No. 17,476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.

The lower court denied the appellant’s petition for an injunction, and that ruling is here presented as error arising upon the evidence. By the petition it was alleged that the appellant owned a lot in the village of Fontanet, on the line of appellee’s railway and adjacent to its right-of-way, upon which lot appellant maintained a building for the combined purposes of a business house, a dwelling and a meeting place for social and benevolent societies; that the appellee was proceeding in the erection of a structure, opposite and very near to the appellant’s building, to be used as a coal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. MauzyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Robinson v. City of ValparaisoIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Keiser v. LovettIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. Windfall Manufacturing Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Griffin v. HubbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Siegel v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Town of Speedway v. DuganIndiana Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API