Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. First Nat. Bank of Paris
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 25, 1934No. 4493PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice
(after stating the case as above).
The points for decision as raised by the demurrers are-that of whether or not (1) the alleged action was barred by the statute of limitation of two years, and (2) the alleged transaction was a bailment to the bank as such, imposing a relation of duty or trust in respect to the property, and with legal responsibility for loss resulting from want of care or for neglect of safe-keeping.
As against the demurrer, the facts are to be taken as true as stated in the petition. The material facts appearing are: That during the month of April, 1916, the plaintiff was a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- National Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Citizens' Central Nat. Bank of NY v. AppletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sumsion v. Streator-Smith, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Bank of California v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Houston v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Allen v. Massey-Harris Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935