Baird v. Quality Foods, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, District Judge:
The defendant seeks to compel the plaintiff, an Oklahoma resident, to appear in New Orleans for a physical examination by a doctor of the defendant’s choice. The plaintiff asserts that he should not be required to undergo the expense of a trip.
Rule 35 gives the court wide discretion concerning the terms and conditions that may be imposed in requiring a party to submit to a physical examination. See Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 35.04. Although there is some division of authority, most judges have, in the usual case, *213ordered the plaintiff to appear for examination at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pierce v. Th. Brovig of FarsundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Gale v. National Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Warren v. Weber & Heidenthaler, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blount v. Wake Electric Membership Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Levick v. Steiner Transocean Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- McKenney v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Rainey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1991
- Clark v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.