Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 21, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Wlliis —

Affirming.

The questions raised by this record are difficult, some of them are new, and all of them are interesting and important. They grew out of the insolvency of the Louisville Title Company. The controversy revolves around the pivotal question whether the borrower or the bondholders must suffer the loss arising from the dissipation of payments made by the borrower to the title company, trustee, as required by the contract. The bondholders claim to be bone fide purchasers for value without notice and before maturity of negotiable instruments, which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. McClelland v. . Norfolk Southern R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. McLeod v. DespainOregon Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Masonic Widows' & Orphans' Home & Infirmary v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Krieger v. Title Insurance & TrustCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Blieden (In Re Blieden)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1985
  4. Long John Silver's, Inc. v. Diwa III, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
  5. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API