Legal Opinion

Klein v. King Kullen Grocery Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered July 16, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint based upon lack of notice, the defendant is required to make a prima facie showing establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law (see, Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc., 248 AD2d 436, 437; Colt v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 209 AD2d 294,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Colt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Solow v. LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ryder v. King Kullen Grocery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API