Legal Opinion

Strong City Gin Co. v. Herring & Young

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1938No. 28072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The action here started as replevin, changed to conversion, and resulted in Judgment for plaintiff partnership. It was claimed that defendant bought cotton and converted such cotton to its own use, notwithstanding the fact that plaintiff had of record a chattel mortgage covering the purchased cotton. The mortgage was undated, and that, together with the description therein, is urged as making the mortgage ineffective as notice. The description, it is asserted, is too indefinite, both as a matter of law and as applied to the facts.

In the mortgage various notes secured by said mortgage are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stonebraker v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Golden v. CockrilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  3. First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Moore v. CrittendenMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Estes v. SpringerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Exchange Insurance Corp. v. BevingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Diocese of Samoa Pago Pago v. K.M.S.T. Inc.High Court of American Samoa · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API