Legal Opinion

Drock v. Great A. P. Tea Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1939No. 2935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GUERNSEY, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County.

The plaintiff, Myrtle M. Drock, brought an action against the defendant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, for damages for personal injuries, alleging that she purchased certain liver pudding at one of defendant’s stores; that said liver pudding was unfit for human consumption; that she ate of the same; and that as the immediate consequence of eating said liver pudding she became ill and suffered damages for which she asks compensation.

The trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Portage Markets Co. v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Derby Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Hughes Provision Co. v. La Mear Poultry & Egg Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Rubbo v. Hughes Provision Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API