Legal Opinion

Ward v. Gray

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 15, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’HARA, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action in eject ment pursuant to 10 Del.C. § 6701 to establish their title to Lot No. 11, Edgewater Acres Development, Baltimore Hundred, Sussex County (“Lot 11”). Plaintiffs assert that they are the record owners of said lot in fee simply absolute, entitled to full, immediate and exclusive possession thereof. They also claim ouster by defendants Gray, et al., from Lot 11 on or about May 1, 1973 and continued unlawful possession and numerous acts of waste by defendants from that time on. Plaintiffs ask for a writ of Habere Facias Possessionem and damages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harding v. Ja Laur Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Robins v. GarvineSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  3. MacKubbin v. Rosedale Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Robins v. GarvineCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  5. Robins v. GarvineCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. Town of FitzwilliamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Baldwin v. New Castle CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
  3. Department of Finance of Sussex County v. ClarkeSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
  4. The Town of Camden v. GoldsmithSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
  5. Tunnell v. RinglerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API