Legal Opinion

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Zadeck Energy Group, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided December 15, 2005No. 03-CV-1166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BARNES, District Judge.

Before the Court are two pending motions for summary judgment. The first motion was filed on behalf of Plaintiff Bituminous Casualty Corporation (“Bituminous”) and is styled as Plaintiffs Amended and Substituted Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 36). Separate Defendant Tri-State Oil Tool Company, Inc. (“Tri-State”) has filed a response to the motion. (Doc. No. 42). 1 Bituminous filed a reply to Tri-State’s response. (Doc. No. 49). The second motion before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of Separate Defendant Tri-State.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. EMPLOYERS'FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BealsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bull v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2018
  2. Reek v. SerierDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API