Legal Opinion

Humphries v. Hester

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 4, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In this case, there is but one assignment of error that appears to be meritorious. That assignment is based upon the fact that R. W. McBride was a party defendant to the suit; that no service binding on such defendant was had; that a decree pro confesso was entered against R. W. McBride without service having been had upon him; and that therefore the court was without jurisdiction to enter a final decree, as long as defendant R. W. McBride stood as a party defendant to the suit and the cause was not at issue as to him.

Constructive service upon the defendant R. W. McBride was necessarily…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shrader v. ShraderSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Balan v. the Wekiwa RanchSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Kirkland v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Bannon v. TrammellSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Chilton v. DockstaderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oates v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API