Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2003No. 71A04-0205-CR-229PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Rochelle Jones and Tiwanna Shaw were charged with welfare fraud in separate causes in St. Joseph Superior Court. Both entered pleas of guilty, but the trial court subsequently dismissed each case because the charges were filed outside the statute of limitations. The State of Indiana appeals the dismissals. We affirm the trial court as to the disposition of Jones' case, but reverse as to Shaw.

Issue

The State raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as whether the trial court properly dismissed the cases against Jones and Shaw.

Facts and Procedural History I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Coomer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Roberts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SagalovskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. LindsayIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. John O. Study v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API