Legal Opinion

Moore v. Parish

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 16, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mechanic’s Lien.—Work and material. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tutiiill, Judge, presiding. Heal'd at this court in the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

A stipulation as to interests of third persons now in this record, takes the case out of the reason on which it was decided when here before. 50 Ill. App. 233. And the Supreme Court have since decided that the reason was bad. Campbell v. Jacobson, 145 Ill. 387; McIntosh v. Schroeder, 39 N. E. Rep. 478.

The attempt by the appellant to comply with section 4 of the act as to liens, in “ setting forth the terms when such material was furnished or labor performed,” was by a verification of an account as follows:

“Chicago, Ill., March 24,1891.

James A. Parish to Anton Moore, Dr.:

To balance due for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. JacobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McDonald v. RosengartenIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McDonald v. RosengartenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  4. Moore v. ParrishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  5. Campbell v. JacobsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carlson v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API