Legal Opinion

Knope v. Nunn

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Monroe county court. Action by Mary A. Knope against Joseph Nunn. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order ■denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The purpose of the action is to recover an amount of the alleged proceeds of the sale of certain real estate, *897to which, prior to the sale, the parties had the title as tenants in common, and of which the plaintiff was the owner of an undivided third part. They united in a deed of conveyance to one Hirschfield, of date June 5, 1889, for the consideration of §5,000. The deed so executed was then taken by the defendant for delivery to the grantee named in it when the transaction of the sale should be completed. He afterwards, on July 17, 1889, delivered the deed to such grantee, who executed and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Kirtz v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Ormes v. . DauchyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Coles v. ColesNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Floyd v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferris v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Ferris v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API