Legal Opinion

State v. Roybal

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 25, 2008No. 20060911-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

191 P.3d 822 (2008)

2008 UT App 286

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Jose Baltarcar ROYBAL, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20060911-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

July 25, 2008.

Randall W. Richards, Ogden, for Appellant.

Mark L. Shurtleff, atty. gen., and Ryan D. Tenney, asst. atty. gen., Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before THORNE, Associate P.J., DAVIS and ORME, JJ.

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Jose Baltarcar Roybal appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude that the appeal is well-taken, reverse the denial of the motion to suppress, and remand for a new…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API